The New York Times follows the rest of the MSM in the slide toward irrelevancy (one can hope...)

Long a journalistic standard of integrity (or so I'm told), even THEY now make room for the range of "chosen" candidates (despite Ron Paul winning more votes than either Giuliani or Thompson, almost combined!).  This is really sickening.

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/votes/index.html#1

A friend sent a recent email with the word "media-ocrity" complaining about the media in general and their obscuring of issues, but I think instead we may be headed toward a media-ocracy where our corporate media does the deciding, and we just vote like we're told...